If you do short journeys look at petrol, long journeys diesel. I would start with the 1.4 85PS engine at least or the 1.2 TDI 75PS but the 1.2TSI 105PS is great and quite lively. Expect 40-50 MPG from the petrols, 1.2 being the best or 60-70 MPG from the 1.2 TDI 75PS. Save.
The 1.2 Tsi is a fine engine and a VERY popular choice throughout the Vag range. I researched it well before buying mine and in comparison to the vast number out there, the engine is sound and reliable. All engines have their "Friday models"
There's no way the 1.2 engine would accelerate to 100km/h in 8,9s. Just no way. I have the old 1.6 NA engine (102hp) and it would do 11.5s in the best conditions and mine has really short gear ratios for 1-2-3. Even with a slightly more potent engine, more torque than mine and slightly lighter car, there's no way it would get to 8,9s.
There were some hideous reliability problems with the 180bhp 1.4, not affected the 1.2 AFAIK. Had a 1.2 tsi in a golf and thought the engine was superb really linear in its power delivery if
29. With the demise of the 1.6 diesel and 1.8 turbo petrol options, the only choice for more power in the Yeti is to go for the 2.0-litre diesel in either 108- or 148bhp forms. The more powerful
1. Yeti 1.2. Posted 10 March, 2014. Regarding engine failures on the 1.2 TSI engine, I have just sent my Yeti to the workshop with warning lamps lit on EPC, traction control and exhaust control. The mechanic says that the turbo has failed. Luckily, my warrant only expires next month.
VW is a reliable car, their cars score highly in reliability tests, but all cars have a weak link. In this post, I’ll cover the 2.0 Tsi engine issues, common VW problems, and the emission scandal. When I was a kid growing up, the VW bug was the trusty family wheels to have.
The 1.2 TSI does offer extra power, but there have been occasional concerns about its reliability. Some owners have reported issues with the TSI engine, which can lead to higher maintenance costs. On the other hand, the 1.2 MPI is generally considered to be more reliable and might require less maintenance over time.
6-speed manual. Claimed FE. 18.24kmpl. Tested FE (City) 15.16kmpl. Tested FE (Highway) 17.21kmpl. The Polo’s new engine doesn’t manage to match its claimed fuel efficiency figures in either of
My wife is thinking of buying a Skoda Yeti 1.2 TSI with a manual gearbox and wants a car for up to 10 years although the mileage will not be high at around 7000 miles annually. Probably looking at a 2015 registered model. I have read that there have been quite a few low mileage problems, especially around the cam chain. I wanted to know if the engine was modified and if 2015 models are more
1.2 TSI or 1.4 TSI. Simple answer, try both and decide. Unfortunately there is no such thing as a a single 1.4TSi - the design changed numerous times due to problems. Since the OP is looking to buy the ST he will only be able to buy one fitted with the current reliable belt drive engine.
Information on the engines is pretty poor actually - looked high and low for reliable info. Also just to answer an earlier question, both the 85PS and 105 PS 1.2 TSI engines are 8v.
The 8NR-FTS engine is a new member of Toyota's NR family. It was introduced in 2015 and became offering first in the Toyota Auris, and later as an option for the Toyota C-HR. The 8NR-FTS is a 1.2-liter (one of the smallest in the NR-series) four-cylinder gasoline turbocharged engine equipped with direct fuel injection and it represents Toyota's
MVOCoc. g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/79g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/217g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/10g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/7g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/313g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/446g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/295g4vffon7rn.pages.dev/329
is the 1.2 tsi engine reliable
